… The judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate." Wade ruling in 1973, Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun also ignored the science, stating, "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. Yet there's one scientific premise we all agree upon: The unborn child in her mother's womb - she's a baby. But Iowa's Coalition of Pro-Life Leaders includes Catholics, Protestants, agnostics, evangelicals and more - people who would deeply disagree on religion. It's killing."īasu's column ignores this scientific reality, instead raising the tired, misleading straw man that the pro-life argument is inherently religious instead of scientific. Lisa Harris of Planned Parenthood of Mid and South Michigan put it even more plainly: " are not stupid. Bernard Nathanson, who co-founded the abortion advocacy group NARAL and personally presided over 60,000 abortions, later confessed in the film "The Silent Scream" that "Modern technologies have convinced us that beyond question the unborn child is simply another human being, another member of the human community, indistinguishable in every way from any of us."Īnd at a 2014 panel discussion presented by the National Abortion Federation, Dr. … The death of a fetus is a real death."ĭr. #When does a baby have a heartbeat seriesNaomi Wolf, a Clinton advisor and abortion supporter, wrote in The New Republic: "Clinging to a rhetoric about abortion in which there is no life and no death, we entangle our beliefs in a series of self-delusions, fibs and evasions. "It is plain experimental evidence."Įven many abortion advocates have come to grips with this scientific reality. " is no longer a matter of taste or opinion," testified professor Jerome LeJuene of the University of Descartes. Children survive premature birth today at younger and younger ages, demonstrating how arbitrary it is to argue life doesn't begin until a baby is "viable." And today's 3-D ultrasounds give us astonishing, heartwarming pictures, revealing that the little child in her mother's womb - she's a baby. The 37 years of scientific advancement since that subcommittee hearing have only confirmed its findings. There is overwhelming agreement on this point in countless medical, biological and scientific writings." (Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, Report, 97th Congress, 1st Session, 1981) This straightforward biological fact should not be distorted to serve sociological, political or economic goals."Īfter examining the evidence, the Senate subcommittee reported: "Physicians, biologists and other scientists agree that conception marks the beginning of the life of a human being - a being that is alive and is a member of the human species. Bowes of the University of Colorado Medical School asserted: "The beginning of a single human life is from a biological point of view a simple and straightforward matter - the beginning is conception. Scientifically, we pass through different stages as we grow, but we don't pass from person to non-person, or vice versa.Īt that same 1981 government hearing, Dr. Yes, the baby of five weeks in the womb differs from the newborn, but so does the toddler differ from the teen. In other words, Matthews-Ross was saying, a baby is a baby - from fertilization, to heartbeat, to birth.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |